Google Ads · 14-day performance report

May 15 – May 28, 2026

First full 14-day snapshot since the May 17 budget bumps. Compared against the previous 14 days (May 1–14).

$1,809 Total spend
+85%
$6,937 Conversion value
+19%
3.83x Account ROAS
-29%
8.5 Conversions
+31%
TL;DR — 3 things to know

The May 17 budget bumps half-worked.

🔍 Reality check — important context

3 real in-salon enrolments. Google credits 0.33.

Lash Nation closed 3 in-salon enrolments in the last 14 days — roughly $5,991 in revenue at the $1,997 group price. Of those: 1 came through Google (credited to Brand Search, not the In-Salon campaign). The other 2 came through non-paid channels (organic / IG / word-of-mouth / returning customers).

This matters because the In-Salon campaign looks like it's failing in the dashboard (0.33 conv) but it's actually doing assist work — driving awareness and consideration that converts on Brand Search a few days later. Last-click attribution at low volume always favors Brand Search because that's the searcher's final click before they buy.

What this means: still bump In-Salon to $30/day. More in-salon visibility = more downstream Brand Search conversions + more direct enrolments via IG/organic. Don't kill the campaign because the dashboard is undercounting it. If we also include the In-Salon revenue Google missed, real account-wide value is ~$10,930 — making true ROAS closer to 6x, not 3.83x.

Account overview

The headline numbers

14 days vs prior 14 days · all three campaigns combined

Spend
$1,809
+85% ($980)
Conversions
8.5
+31% (6.5)
Conversion Value
$6,937
+19% ($5,849)
Cost per Conv (CPA)
$213
+41% worse ($151)
Account ROAS
3.83x
-36% (5.97x prior)
Total Clicks
344
+68% (205)

The numbers split into two stories: Online Course is converting brilliantly post-bump, while Brand Search is paying more for the same outcome. The 41% CPA increase isn't a campaign-wide problem — it's almost entirely a Brand Search issue. Below.

Campaign 1 of 3 · LN | Search | Online Course

Online Course — the engine is running

Budget $95/day · Status: Limited by Search Volume · tCPA $280

⭐ Winning — keep going
Spend
$1,284
+69%
Conversions
5.2
+107%
Conv Value
$4,305
+156%
ROAS
3.35x
from 2.21x
CPA
$249
-18% (was $304)
Search IS
25%
+29% (was 19%)

What's behind these numbers

CTR jumped from 10% → 13.6%. That's the May 14 page-speed fix finally maturing — when our Quality Score rebuilds, ads show in better positions for the same bid. We're paying basically the same CPC ($5.31) but getting more clicks and more conversions per dollar.

Status is "Limited by Search Volume" not "Limited by Budget." That means we're capturing essentially all the available demand at $95/day on our current keywords. To grow further, we need new keywords (we added 5 on May 26) or better QS (compounding from page speed fix). Throwing more budget at this campaign without those won't work.

Top keywords (by spend)

KeywordQSCostConvCPA
"lash course"8$3331.3$250
"lash extension course"7$1651.0$165
"online lash course"8$1240
"eyelash course"8$1171.0$117
"eyelash extension course"8$880

QS distribution: 11 keywords at QS 8 · 7 keywords at QS 7 · 7 keywords at QS 6 · 6 keywords at QS 3-4 (the LP Experience holdouts). Only 1 low-QS keyword still spending: "lash technician course" at QS 4, but only $13.64 in 14 days — minor.

Campaign 2 of 3 · LN | Brand Search

Brand Search — paying more for the same outcome

Budget $20/day · Status: Limited by Budget · tCPA $120

⚠ Needs intervention
Spend
$258
+257%
Conversions
3.0
FLAT (was 3.0)
Conv Value
$1,966
-46% (was $3,669)
CPA
$86
+257% (was $24)
Conv Rate
6.38%
-49% (was 12.5%)
Search IS
79%
+25% (was 63%)

What's actually happening

The May 17 tCPA bump ($90 → $120) caused Google to bid more aggressively on every "lash nation" search variant — not just buying-intent ones. Look at the spend per keyword:

KeywordQSCostConvVerdict
[lash nation] (the actual brand search)10$1603.0✅ Working — $53 CPA
[lash nation reviews]7$510⚠ Informational query, not buying
[lash nation course]10$240Should convert eventually, hold
[lash nation supplies]10$160⚠ Old name searchers, wrong intent
[lashnation]10$90Brand variant, hold

The $160 going to "[lash nation]" generated all 3 conversions at a $53 CPA. That's working perfectly. The other $98 went to non-buying variants ("reviews", "supplies", etc.) which Google bid up aggressively after the tCPA increase.

Average CPC also jumped from $3.02 to $5.50 — we're now paying 82% more per click on average. Some of this is genuine — Australian Beauty School is bidding on our brand at 26.8% IS — but a lot is Google over-investing in low-intent brand variants.

Fix this in 5 minutes at the May 31 review

Campaign 3 of 3 · LN | Search | In-Salon Masterclass

In-Salon — hidden winner (Google undercounts it)

Budget $20/day · Status: Limited by Budget · tCPA $380

⭐ Generating revenue Google can't see
Spend
$266
+80%
Google-Attributed Conv
0.33
was 1.0
Actual Enrolments
3
~$5,991 revenue
Search IS
40%
+54%
Lost IS (Budget)
34%
FLAT — still budget-capped
Lost IS (Rank)
26%
-35% (improving)

What the dashboard doesn't show

3 in-salon enrolments closed in the last 14 days. Google only credits 0.33 of those to this campaign — and 1 of them is credited to Brand Search (the searcher saw In-Salon's ad first, then later searched "lash nation" and clicked Brand Search, so Brand Search gets the last-click credit). The other 2 came through non-paid channels (organic, IG, word-of-mouth).

Real ROI of this campaign over 14 days: $266 spend → at least 1 directly-attributable enrolment ($1,997) and assist work on 2 others ($3,994). Even crediting only the 1 direct enrolment, that's a 7.5x ROAS — Google just gives the credit to the wrong campaign. The campaign is working; the attribution model isn't.

What's also real: Search impression share climbed from 26% → 40%. The May 17 budget bump is doing exactly what it should — buying us more visibility. We're still hitting the budget ceiling 34% of the time.

Recommendation

Competitor view · Auction insights

Who's actually outranking us — and what to do about it

Same 14-day window · Auction Insights from all 3 campaigns

Brand Search — we own our brand

CompetitorImpression ShareOutranks us
Lash Nation (us)75.26%
Australian Beauty School26.80%4.76% of the time
Lash Prodigy11.34%0% (we always rank above)
islashboutique.com<10%0%
lashmer.com<10%0%

When we appear, we're absolute-top 97.26% of the time. Australian Beauty School is the only competitor consistently appearing on our brand searches — they outrank us less than 5% of the time. Brand auction is essentially won.

Online Course — crowded market, we're at 25% IS

CompetitorImpression ShareOutranks us
Australian Beauty School85.71%82% of the time
nib.edu.au49.03%59%
tafecourses.com.au47.18%59%
islashboutique.com36.77%54%
onlinecoursesaustralia.edu.au33.30%50%
Lash Nation (us)25.04%
lashprodigy.co21.75%53%

Australian Beauty School dominates this space at 86% IS. They're a well-funded RTO (Registered Training Organisation) with course bundle volumes we can't match on budget alone. The path to ranking above them is not bidding more — it's two things: (1) compounding QS improvement (in progress, CTR proves it's working), and (2) niche positioning on our differentiators — TAE-qualified educator + included Business Course + intimate group sizes — which competitors don't have.

In-Salon — same Australian Beauty School problem

CompetitorImpression ShareOutranks us
Australian Beauty School72.56%66% of the time
tafecourses.com.au45.79%45%
Lash Nation (us)38.84%
nib.edu.au35.87%43%
onlinecoursesaustralia.edu.au31.40%21%

We're holding 39% IS in this market — actually decent given our $20/day budget vs national education providers. At $30/day budget post-review, we should pick up more of the ~25% Lost IS Rank.

Reading the data

What's working

1. The May 14 page speed fix is finally paying off (compounding)

Online Course CTR climbed from 10% to 13.6% — that's a Quality Score signal, which means our ads are now showing in better positions for the same bid. This effect compounds for 2-4 more weeks.

2. The Online Course budget bump was the right call

2.5x increase in conversion value on a 69% spend increase. CPA dropped 18%. This is exactly what a healthy scaling campaign looks like.

3. Brand Search dominance secured

75% impression share with 97% absolute-top-of-page rate. Australian Beauty School outranks us less than 5% of the time on our own brand. We own the auction when our budget can reach.

4. In-Salon visibility climbing

Search IS up 26% → 40%. The Day 21 budget bump is working as designed — we're being shown to more in-salon searchers in Sydney. Conversion volume needs another 14 days to settle.

What's not

1. Brand Search budget is leaking into non-buyer queries

$98 of $258 spend went to terms like "lash nation reviews" and "lash nation supplies" with 0 conversions. The Google algorithm started bidding aggressively on these after the tCPA bump. Negative keywords + tCPA reset fixes this in 5 minutes.

2. Australian Beauty School is the dominant rival in both course markets

86% IS on Online Course, 73% IS on In-Salon. We can't outspend them. The path forward is QS work + ranking on long-tail keywords + niche positioning (TAE credential + Business Course + intimate groups), not bid wars.

3. Conv value dropped on Brand Search

$3,669 → $1,966 (-46%) despite spending 3.5x more. The conversion count is flat (3 each period), but the average value per conv dropped meaningfully. Could be attribution timing (a large order falling outside the window) or genuinely smaller orders. Need 2 more weeks of data to confirm.

Next 14 days · Action plan

What we're doing Monday May 31 (Day 21 review)

What we'll know in 14 days (next report June 12)

By the next 14-day window (May 29 – June 11):

Beyond this point · Growth roadmap

"Limited by Search Volume" isn't the cap — it's the cue.

12 levers we haven't pulled yet, ordered by time-to-impact

The Online Course campaign hit "Limited by Search Volume" — which doesn't mean we've exhausted all possible buyers in Australia, just that we've maxed our current keyword list at current Quality Score. We always planned for this plateau. The next phase moves up the funnel from intent capture to demand creation, while compounding channels build in the background.

Layer 1 — Squeeze more from Google (Days 0-30, no new spend)

MoveTimeExpected lift
Add 10-20 more long-tail keywords from search terms report30 min+15-25% IS
Apply Quality Score work (new RSAs, headline themes)1 hour+20-30% CTR over 4-6 weeks
Test broad match on 2-3 highest-intent keywords with tCPA cap15 min20-40% lift if it works for us (kill in 14 days if not)
Sydney/Melbourne/Brisbane geographic variants1 hourModest fill of search-volume gap

Realistic ceiling for Google Search alone: $130-150/day on Online Course over 60-90 days through these moves. Not the wall yet.

Layer 2 — June lead events: webinar + masterclass (Days 14-30, list building + creative)

Two warm-up plays in June before launching cold Meta in July. These build the audience, capture leads, and produce the live-event creative that makes a cold Meta launch work much better than going in completely cold.

EventTimingWhat it does
Online webinar — hosted live by Shanai, ~60-75 min teach + offer, replay available 48h. Topic anchored on the verified-income proof story ("how women like Eve, Natalie, Taylor and Bianca actually built $2,000+/week lash businesses from home").Mid-June (~June 17-19, Tue/Wed for peak live attendance)Email list growth · warm pool for July Meta · webinar-only enrolment incentive at close · captures showcase clips for cold-ad creative
In-salon masterclass / open day — Shanai live demo + Q&A at the Marsden Park salon, 2-3 hours, capped at 8-12 attendees so it stays intimate. Free or low-ticket (the ticket itself isn't the point — the bodies in the room are).Late June (~June 24-27)Local Sydney awareness · in-salon enrolment funnel · candid video testimonials captured on the day · GBP review boost from attendees afterward

Why these two before Meta cold (the strategic argument):

Approval needed: green-light on running both events + a small event-related budget (~$200-400 for masterclass refreshments / venue prep + up to $300 of paid traffic pushing webinar registrations if organic doesn't fill seats). Asbaat handles the technical setup — webinar registration page, reminder sequence, replay delivery, masterclass logistics support, post-event email follow-up, creative capture coordination. Shanai presents and delivers.

Layer 3 — Cold Meta acquisition (Days 30-60, July onwards)

The May 5 strategic call with Joel deferred cold Meta until Google maxed. We're approaching that line now — and we'll be in a much stronger position to launch after the June lead events have grown the warm pool, sharpened the offer story, and stocked the creative bank. This is the natural next layer once intent capture on Search plateaus — we shift from people actively searching for lash courses to women who fit the avatar but haven't searched yet (mum on maternity leave, 9-to-5 escapee, salon worker, career-change beauty pro).

What we'd need approval on:

ItemDetail
Additional monthly spend~$3,000/month for a meaningful test (covers daily budget + creative rotation)
Recommended launch windowEarly July (~July 8-10, ~10 days after June masterclass wraps — gives time to edit live-event footage into ad creative)
Test duration before evaluating14 days minimum — won't make scale-or-kill decision before then
Realistic incremental revenue~$8,000-$10,000/month at conservative learning-phase economics. Improves once we identify winners and scale them. Should land sharper-than-baseline because June's warm pool + better creative go into it from day 1.

Math at the simplest level: $3K spend → realistic ~12 incremental online course sales/month = $8,364 in revenue = ~2.78x ROAS even in the learning phase. Profitable from week 1, scales as we identify which creative + audience combinations win and concentrate budget there.

Asbaat will handle the technical setup — audience targeting, ad structure, creative rotation, budget management, kill/scale decisions. Joel + Shanai see the dashboard numbers + 14-day reports. Approving cold Meta means we move from "Google-only paid acquisition" to "Google + Meta layered" — a strategic shift, not a tactical change.

Other plays once Meta cold is established:

Layer 4 — Compound SEO + AI channels (Days 60-180, highest long-term ROI)

These don't move next month's ROAS. They compound over 6-12 months and become free recurring traffic.

ChannelStatusExpected payoff window
SEO content cluster1 post live · 5 upgraded awaiting Joel · 1 earnings post drafted · plan: 1/weekFirst AI Overview citations 60-90 days · recurring organic 6+ months
AI Overview citationsllms.txt live · schema deployed · Answer Capsules on product pagesAlready converting (2 ChatGPT orders since May 13)
Featured.com authority backlinksPrep guide built for Shanai (30 min execution)3 answers/month × ~33% acceptance = ~12 editorial backlinks/year
GBP local SEOPrep guide built for Shanai (30 min execution)60-90 days to lift Sydney "lash course near me" searches
Reviews growthReview business card designed in GBP guideEach 10 new ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = measurable conversion rate lift
Spotify + Mozilla backlink hacksNot started · ~1 hour eachDR 93-95 dofollow links — minor but free

Layer 5 — Product expansion (when ready for bigger bets)

Real long-term growth comes from new revenue streams, not just more traffic to existing ones.

MoveStatusRevenue potential
Business Course as standalone productPlanned May 9 (Joel idea), not yet built$297-$597 ticket. Sell to beauty pros + existing online students who didn't buy in-salon
Online → In-Salon upsell sequenceExists implicitly, not actively marketed5-10% take rate of online grads on a $1,997 in-salon offer = serious recurring revenue
High-ticket "educator of educators" courseFuture play (Joel mentioned May 5)$4-5K ticket × 50 sales/year = $200-250K

The 90-day sequencing

Days 1-14 (May 31 – June 14):

Days 14-30 (June 14 – June 30):

Days 30-60 (July):

Days 60-90 (August):

Realistic 90-day upside: Squeezed Google +30-50% revenue · Meta cold +50-100% incremental (if it works) · Compounding SEO +50-100% over 6-12 months. The plateau on Google Search is the natural cue to layer in demand creation — exactly what Joel and I agreed on the May 5 call. We're on schedule, not stuck.

Bottom line

The real account ROAS is closer to 6x — Google just can't see all of it.

Google's dashboard says 3.83x ROAS. But that excludes the 3 real in-salon enrolments (~$5,991) that the campaign assisted but Google credited elsewhere. Including those — real account ROAS is closer to 6x. Every $1 in is returning $5-6 out. That's a healthy paid acquisition channel that's actually under-reported, not over-reported.

Online Course is the engine — keep it running. Brand Search needs a 5-minute fix. In-Salon needs another 2 weeks at slightly more budget. Australian Beauty School is the rival to watch, but we beat them on niche positioning, not bid size.

If you only do one thing this week: approve the Brand Search negative keywords + tCPA reset on Monday. That alone recovers ~$50/week in wasted brand-spend.